Back to today's list

Shift-Up: A Framework for Software Engineering Guardrails in AI-native Software Development -- Initial Findings

Petrus Lipsanen, Liisa Rannikko, Fran\c{c}ois Christophe, Konsta Kalliokoski, Vlad Stirbu, Tommi Mikkonen

Published Apr 23, 2026
Editorial review7.2
Relevance0.452
Freshness0.000

Why It Matters

What makes this one worth your time

As generative AI transforms software engineering, establishing effective frameworks like Shift-Up is crucial for maintaining code quality and project sustainability.

Shift-Up offers a structured approach to stabilize AI-driven software development.

Summary

The paper introduces Shift-Up, a framework that applies established software engineering practices as guardrails for AI-native software development, aiming to mitigate issues like architectural drift and maintainability in generative AI implementations.

Key contributions

  • Proposes the Shift-Up framework for AI-native software development.
  • Compares unstructured vibe coding with structured prompt engineering and the Shift-Up approach.
  • Demonstrates the effectiveness of traditional software engineering artifacts in AI-assisted development.

Notable insights

  • The integration of machine-readable requirements can enhance agent behavior and reduce implementation drift.
  • Reinterpreting traditional software engineering practices as guardrails is a novel approach to address challenges in AI-native development.

Possible limitations

  • Not stated in the abstract.

Abstract

arXiv:2604.20436v1 Announce Type: cross Abstract: Generative AI (GenAI) is reshaping software engineering by shifting development from manual coding toward agent-driven implementation. While vibe coding promises rapid prototyping, it often suffers from architectural drift, limited traceability, and reduced maintainability. Applying the design science research (DSR) methodology, this paper proposes Shift-Up, a framework that reinterprets established software engineering practices, like executable requirements (BDD), architectural modeling (C4), and architecture decision records (ADRs), as structural guardrails for GenAI-native development. Preliminary findings from our exploratory evaluation compare unstructured vibe coding, structured prompt engineering, and the Shift-Up approach in the development of a web application. These findings indicate that embedding machine-readable requirements and architectural artifacts stabilizes agent behavior, reduces implementation drift, and shifts human effort toward higher-level design and validation activities. The results suggest that traditional software engineering artifacts can serve as effective control mechanisms in AI-assisted development.